Index
of articles and materials
answer with a
question
© 1997-2002 Costas
Gabrielatos
First published in ELT News 106, December 1997. In this version (March 2002) I’ve
made some changes in phrasing and layout,
and added two versions of activity 4.
This version was published in News in
Brief: The Quarterly Newsletter of INGED, April 2002.
introduction
My observations of lessons and survey of published materials
indicates that even in our ‘communicatively’ oriented language teaching era
learners seem to be somehow conditioned to respond to questions with an
affirmative or negative statement. Unfortunately, this practice reflects more
the balance of power in the classroom rather than real-life spoken interaction.
Responding to a question with another question can be used to express a variety
of feelings/attitudes (e.g. aggression, boredom, irony, irritation). Some
examples:
|
Question |
ð |
Response |
|
How old are you? |
ð |
What kind of
question is that? |
|
Is Tom there? |
ð |
Who wants to know? |
|
Have you done the dishes? |
ð |
Was it my turn? |
|
Are you sure? |
ð |
Wanna
bet? |
|
Am I boring you? |
ð |
What do you think? |
|
D’you want some? |
ð |
Are you nuts? |
By ignoring this
aspect of spoken interaction we do our learners a disservice in two respects:
· Production: the
learners’ flexibility of self-expression is limited;
· Understanding:
learners may not realise that they are the target of irony, aggression etc., as
feelings/attitude are quite often expressed in a covert manner in English.
A note of clarification
I don’t propose that we encourage learners to be aggressive
or impolite, but that we enable them to behave in this way when they choose to.
This is why it is essential to make them aware of the impact and possible
consequences of such responses, so that they know both how and when to use them.
Awareness-raising and Input
The following
procedures will help learners become aware of the use of question-responses.
Ø Select a tape-recorded conversation containing
question-responses. Ask the learners to listen for, and note down, any
responses to questions. Direct their attention to question-responses and ask
them to categorise them according to their function. If the text is long and/or
demanding you can give them the transcript with the question-responses blanked
out and ask them to fill in the blanks.
Ø Guide learners to recognise the
function of question-responses (irony, aggression etc.).
Ø Invite them to share opinions
regarding the impact and possible consequences of such responses.
Ø Ask learners to discuss other
situations where question-responses can be used.
Ø In case you cannot find appropriate
recorded material you can use the following alternatives:
· Record learners during a speaking
activity (e.g. class discussion). Play the tape and ask learners to comment on
their (lack of) use of question-responses.
· Use written texts (dialogues from
coursebooks, readers or stories/novels). In this case you need to check that
the type of language at least resembles natural spoken interaction.
· If no text is
available you can elicit/present the use of question-responses through examples
of different situations.
Please note
You need to guide learners to realise that different
situations call for different types of question-responses and that there are
cases when such responses are not suitable. This can be done through
contrasting two or more texts/situations (e.g. of different levels of
formality).
Practice
Activity 1. Question
Tennis
|
Type |
Game. |
|
Organisation |
Pairs. |
|
Situation |
NA. |
|
Preparation |
Teacher explains the tennis scoring system. |
|
Procedure |
Learner A
‘serves’ by asking learner B an
irritating/inappropriate etc. question; learner B responds with a question, to which learner A has to respond with another question etc. The learner who
cannot provide a question-response loses a point. |
|
Variation |
Doubles: same procedure as above, only now learners play
in opposite pairs (two against two). Any player from team A can respond to a question from team B. |
Activity 2. Mind your
own business
|
Type |
Role-play. |
|
Organisation |
Pairs. |
|
Situation |
A reporter (learner A)
is interviewing a celebrity (e.g. actor, singer, politician) (learner B) |
|
Preparation |
The reporter comes up with a list of questions, some of
which are personal, embarrassing, or irritating. The celebrity tries to
anticipate questions and prepares appropriate responses (i.e. answers to
harmless questions, or question-responses for ‘difficult’ questions). |
|
Procedure |
The reporter tries to elicit as much information as
possible; the celebrity tries to withhold information by responding with a
question. |
Activity 3. Get off my
back
|
Type |
Role-play. |
|
Organisation |
Pairs or groups
of 3/4. |
|
Situation |
Some form
of social gathering (party, dinner, coffee break at a seminar etc.). Learner A is intruding upon learner(s) B (there may be 1-3 learners B). B doesn’t feel like talking to A, so he/she tries to discourage A and make him/her move on to
another ‘victim’. |
|
Preparation |
A prepares a set of conversation
starters including some questions. B
tries to anticipate A’s
questions (based on the type of situation) and prepares appropriate
question-responses. |
|
Procedure |
Learner A tries to start a conversation by
asking questions; learner B tries
to avoid this by being as abrupt etc. as the situation allows, by using
question-responses (among other strategies). |
|
Variation |
You can
vary the roles the learners assume, in order to exploit the limitations of
such strategies. For example, different question-responses will be
appropriate if A is a total
stranger, a colleague, a superior etc. |
Activity 4. The
Interrogation
Version A. Grilled
|
Type |
Role-play. |
|
Organisation |
Pairs or
groups of 3. |
|
Situation |
A suspect
(learner A) is interrogated by one
or two policemen (learners B)
regarding a crime (theft, robbery, murder etc.). The policemen are almost
certain that the suspect is guilty. |
|
Preparation |
Both
sides are given some facts regarding the crime (e.g. place, time); not all
facts should be given so as to maintain suspense and encourage creativity.
The policemen (B) prepare a set of
questions; the suspect (A) tries to
anticipate the questions (based on the given facts) and prepares appropriate
question-responses. |
|
Procedure |
The
policemen try to make the suspect confess, using a barrage of questions; the
suspect tries to gain time and mislead the policemen by using
question-responses. |
|
Variation |
In larger
classes 3/4 policemen can interrogate 2 suspects. |
Version B. Now, own up
|
Type |
Role-play. |
|
Organisation |
Pairs, or groups of 3-6. |
|
Situation |
A child
(learner A) is questioned by a
parent (learner B) about a case of misbehaviour
(coming late, trouble at school, bad grades etc.). |
|
Preparation |
Both
sides are given details regarding the event and some time to prepare. It
would be better if not all facts were given so as to make the activity more
realistic, maintain suspense and encourage creativity. The
parent (B) prepares a set of
questions. The child (A) tries to
anticipate the questions (based on the given facts) and prepares appropriate
question-responses. |
|
Procedure |
The
parent tries to find out the truth, or to make the child own up, using a
barrage of questions; the child tries to gain time and mislead the parent by
using question-responses. |
|
Variation |
In larger
classes 2 parents can question 2-4 children. In this case extra time is
needed to give parents and children the opportunity to co-ordinate. |
Version C. Lovers’
tiff
|
Type |
Role-play. |
|
Organisation |
Pairs. |
|
Situation |
A couple
(learners A and B) are having a fight over an alleged ‘infidelity’. A is
questioned by his/her partner (learner
B). |
|
Preparation |
Both
sides are given details regarding the event and some time to prepare. It
would be better if not all facts were given so as to make the activity more
realistic, maintain suspense and encourage creativity. Partner B
prepare questions. Partner B tries to anticipate the questions (based on the
given facts) and prepares appropriate question-responses. |
|
Procedure |
One
partner tries to find out the truth using a barrage of questions; the other
tries to gain time and mislead the partner by using question-responses. |
|
Variation |
You may
want to add friends or in-laws in the argument. |
feedback
After the
activities invite learners to comment on the following:
Ø What feelings/attitudes were expressed
through the question-responses.
Ø Whether the language was appropriate
for the situation.
Ø Whether question-responses were
over-used.
Ø Problems and/or misunderstandings
that could arise because of the (over-)use of such responses.
____________________________________________________________________________________________
Related articles
Teaching
Communication and Interaction Strategies: An action research project
Learning how to Fish: Fostering fluency and independence
Davis, R. S. (1994). "Say what?": Getting students to ask questions. The
Language Teacher, 18(7), 12-15.
Index
of online articles and materials