Index of articles and materials

 

 

 

answer with a question

 

© 1997-2002 Costas Gabrielatos

 

 

First published in ELT News 106, December 1997. In this version (March 2002) I’ve made some changes in phrasing and layout,

and added two versions of activity 4. This version was published in News in Brief: The Quarterly Newsletter of INGED,  April 2002.

 

 

 

introduction

My observations of lessons and survey of published materials indicates that even in our ‘communicatively’ oriented language teaching era learners seem to be somehow conditioned to respond to questions with an affirmative or negative statement. Unfortunately, this practice reflects more the balance of power in the classroom rather than real-life spoken interaction. Responding to a question with another question can be used to express a variety of feelings/attitudes (e.g. aggression, boredom, irony, irritation). Some examples:           

 


Question

ð

Response

How old are you?       

ð

 What kind of question is that?

Is Tom there?             

ð

 Who wants to know?

Have you done the dishes?

ð

 Was it my turn?

Are you sure?             

ð

 Wanna bet?

Am I boring you?       

ð

 What do you think?

D’you want some?     

ð

 Are you nuts?

 

By ignoring this aspect of spoken interaction we do our learners a disservice in two respects:

·   Production: the learners’ flexibility of self-expression is limited;

·   Understanding: learners may not realise that they are the target of irony, aggression etc., as feelings/attitude are quite often expressed in a covert manner in English.

 

A note of clarification

I don’t propose that we encourage learners to be aggressive or impolite, but that we enable them to behave in this way when they choose to. This is why it is essential to make them aware of the impact and possible consequences of such responses, so that they know both how and when to use them.

 

 

Awareness-raising and Input

 

The following procedures will help learners become aware of the use of question-responses.

Ø     Select a tape-recorded conversation containing question-responses. Ask the learners to listen for, and note down, any responses to questions. Direct their attention to question-responses and ask them to categorise them according to their function. If the text is long and/or demanding you can give them the transcript with the question-responses blanked out and ask them to fill in the blanks.

Ø     Guide learners to recognise the function of question-responses (irony, aggression etc.).

Ø     Invite them to share opinions regarding the impact and possible consequences of such responses.

Ø     Ask learners to discuss other situations where question-responses can be used.

Ø     In case you cannot find appropriate recorded material you can use the following alternatives:

·  Record learners during a speaking activity (e.g. class discussion). Play the tape and ask learners to comment on their (lack of) use of question-responses.

·  Use written texts (dialogues from coursebooks, readers or stories/novels). In this case you need to check that the type of language at least resembles natural spoken interaction.

·  If no text is available you can elicit/present the use of question-responses through examples of different situations.

 

Please note

You need to guide learners to realise that different situations call for different types of question-responses and that there are cases when such responses are not suitable. This can be done through contrasting two or more texts/situations (e.g. of different levels of formality).

 

 

Practice

 

Activity 1. Question Tennis

 

Type    

Game.

Organisation

Pairs.

Situation

NA.

Preparation

Teacher explains the tennis scoring system.

Procedure

Learner A ‘serves’ by asking learner B an irritating/inappropriate etc. question; learner B responds with a question, to which learner A has to respond with another question etc. The learner who cannot provide a question-response loses a point.

Variation

Doubles: same procedure as above, only now learners play in opposite pairs (two against two). Any player from team A can respond to a question from team B.

 

 

Activity 2. Mind your own business

 

Type    

Role-play.

Organisation

Pairs.

Situation

A reporter (learner A) is interviewing a celebrity (e.g. actor, singer, politician) (learner B)

Preparation

The reporter comes up with a list of questions, some of which are personal, embarrassing, or irritating. The celebrity tries to anticipate questions and prepares appropriate responses (i.e. answers to harmless questions, or question-responses for ‘difficult’ questions).

Procedure

The reporter tries to elicit as much information as possible; the celebrity tries to withhold information by responding with a question.

 

 

Activity 3. Get off my back

 

Type    

Role-play.

Organisation

Pairs or groups of 3/4.

Situation

Some form of social gathering (party, dinner, coffee break at a seminar etc.). Learner A is intruding upon learner(s) B (there may be 1-3 learners B). B doesn’t feel like talking to A, so he/she tries to discourage A and make him/her move on to another ‘victim’. 

Preparation

A prepares a set of conversation starters including some questions. B tries to anticipate A’s questions (based on the type of situation) and prepares appropriate question-responses.

Procedure

Learner A tries to start a conversation by asking questions; learner B tries to avoid this by being as abrupt etc. as the situation allows, by using question-responses (among other strategies).

Variation

You can vary the roles the learners assume, in order to exploit the limitations of such strategies. For example, different question-responses will be appropriate if A is a total stranger, a colleague, a superior etc.

 

 

Activity 4. The Interrogation

 

Version A. Grilled

Type    

Role-play.

Organisation

Pairs or groups of 3.

Situation

A suspect (learner A) is interrogated by one or two policemen (learners B) regarding a crime (theft, robbery, murder etc.). The policemen are almost certain that the suspect is guilty.

Preparation

Both sides are given some facts regarding the crime (e.g. place, time); not all facts should be given so as to maintain suspense and encourage creativity. The policemen (B) prepare a set of questions; the suspect (A) tries to anticipate the questions (based on the given facts) and prepares appropriate question-responses.

Procedure

The policemen try to make the suspect confess, using a barrage of questions; the suspect tries to gain time and mislead the policemen by using question-responses.

Variation

In larger classes 3/4 policemen can interrogate 2 suspects.

 

Version B. Now, own up

 

Type    

Role-play.

Organisation

Pairs, or groups of 3-6.

Situation

A child (learner A) is questioned by a parent (learner B) about a case of misbehaviour (coming late, trouble at school, bad grades etc.).

Preparation

Both sides are given details regarding the event and some time to prepare. It would be better if not all facts were given so as to make the activity more realistic, maintain suspense and encourage creativity.

The parent (B) prepares a set of questions. The child (A) tries to anticipate the questions (based on the given facts) and prepares appropriate question-responses.

Procedure

The parent tries to find out the truth, or to make the child own up, using a barrage of questions; the child tries to gain time and mislead the parent by using question-responses.

Variation

In larger classes 2 parents can question 2-4 children. In this case extra time is needed to give parents and children the opportunity to co-ordinate.

 

Version C. Lovers’ tiff

 

Type    

Role-play.

Organisation

Pairs.

Situation

A couple (learners A and B) are having a fight over an alleged ‘infidelity’. A is questioned by his/her partner (learner B).

Preparation

Both sides are given details regarding the event and some time to prepare. It would be better if not all facts were given so as to make the activity more realistic, maintain suspense and encourage creativity.

Partner B prepare questions. Partner B tries to anticipate the questions (based on the given facts) and prepares appropriate question-responses.

Procedure

One partner tries to find out the truth using a barrage of questions; the other tries to gain time and mislead the partner by using question-responses.

Variation

You may want to add friends or in-laws in the argument.

 

 

feedback

After the activities invite learners to comment on the following:

Ø     What feelings/attitudes were expressed through the question-responses.

Ø     Whether the language was appropriate for the situation.

Ø     Whether question-responses were over-used.

Ø     Problems and/or misunderstandings that could arise because of the (over-)use of such responses.

 

____________________________________________________________________________________________

 

Related articles

Teaching Communication and Interaction Strategies: An action research project

Learning how to Fish: Fostering fluency and independence

 

Davis, R. S. (1994). "Say what?": Getting students to ask questions. The Language Teacher, 18(7), 12-15.

 

Index of online articles and materials